Some people believe that universities should only accept students with high marks. Others believe that universities must accept student of all ages regardless their previous grades. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A highly controversial topic today relates to whether universities should just accept mark-qualified candidates or allow everyone to enrol without an eligible academic background. In

this

essay, I will examine

this

question from both points of view and

then

explain why I believe grade evaluation is still more important. There are Pedagogues who are of the opinion that test results were the best method to assess candidates before joining college. The main reason for

this

belief is that a higher education programme requires well-equipped knowledge from learners. It is possible to say that students have to demonstrate an appropriate basis to adapt to the requirements of a specific major. A good illustration of

this

is in most countries around the world if learners want to study engineering, they have to pass a statistical analytical test to prove their ability in

this

field.

On the other hand

, some social activists are convinced that a bachelor's degree should be available for everyone who is seeking higher schooling. It is often argued that joining in university is just the

first

step and a more significant challenge is how to graduate from

this

program.

Also

, the more high-skilled graduate will benefit for economic growth of a nation. A particularly good example here is Australia freely permits their citizens

taking

Change the verb form

to take

show examples

part in universities because it will supply quality labour for all industries in

this

country. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merit. On balance,

however

, I feel that those who acquired brilliant results in high school have paid tremendous effort

thus

they deserve more chances to surpass institutions of higher education.