Some people argue that individuals’ freedom should be in accordance with laws and rules, otherwise, society cannot function as it should be. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

One of the most fundamental civil rights is the autonomy to do whatever he wishes to do. I;

however

, believe that civilization could not work properly unless

this

should be put under systems of laws and

rules

. My

first

justification is that the history of humans has proven the significant importance of legislation to maintain and develop a community. Take Rome ,

for example

, its citizens were requested to become oak men on army or merchant ships, which contributed to its dominant control over a long period. Without strict regulations, it perhaps had failed to recruit a sufficient number of workers and

then

Roman social organisms could not have performed as well as they did.

Furthermore

, a humanity in which people are free to do with little restriction likely leads to more negative impacts, not least crime rates. There is no disputing the fact that an unhealthy society is an undoubtedly define consequence when its member does not find guilty after having committed violence. No

rules

acting as deterrents would, more or less, encourage more people to harm innocent others. Some opponents argue that laws are obstacles to the development of arts and fairness due to a strict frame of regulations, which is an incorrect perspective.

Rules

do not mean to steal the independence of the community, but they are, in a way, protecting

instead

. Being kept safe in a well-ordered public, artists are more creative to create their works without worrying about criminals outside.

In addition

, it is obvious that governments have no right to force them to do unwanted things and they are free to make their own choices. In conclusion, I contend that

rules

and laws are truly indispensable for society's functions. Freedom and social regulations are in a mutual relationship.