Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondarySome school. What extent do you agree or disagree?

Learning a foreign language at an early stage of life is more beneficial than grasping it in the later years of school life. I agree with the passage given. Children at a young age from two-ten

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

can learn and practice new lessons, languages and much more. Their brain is still developing, and they can process knowledge faster than at any stage of life. Teaching them a new dialect can help them in the future if they shift to a new country or an organisation which has a base outside India, and they only need candidates to speak that Speech.

For example

, if a child learns French vocabulary will help him know what French culture is, and how people of that country live or spend their day, the child can visit French Embassy to read some books, or to watch theatre plays,

this

will help him add a new feather to his cap. On the

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

contrary if we see

this

may overburden the child as he has to complete his homework for six subjects, and

this

may hamper his playtime. They might compare themselves with their fellow mates and may raise a question as to why he/she has been burdened with an extra speech, but if we make them understand the pros or how they can be different from other children that can lead them to learn the prose with more zest and zeal. I believe spending moments over the later years of growth understanding a new dialect or culture would have been more difficult and time-consuming than learning at an age when the child’s brain is still polishing. Habits come with practice and growth is all about new lessons which one learns throughout the activity.