The government should give each citizen a basic income so that they have enough money to live on, even if they are unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?

Due to the high unemployment

rate

, many people believe that

government

should pay all citizens basic salaries irrespective of whether they are jobless or not to live on. In my ,opinion only the unemployed should be paid so they can lead a good

life

and the employed should not be paid the same.

To begin

with, there are two reasons why the unemployed should be paid basic

income

Firstly

, providing a basic

income

to unemployed

individuals

will reduce the crime

rate

. As unemployed

individuals

can commit any offence to get money to feed their tummies.

For instance

, in ,Africa there is a high crime

rate

due to the unavailability of basic needs people.

Secondly

, by paying a fixed amount of salary to unemployed citizens, they can lead a good quality of

life

. It can improve their

life

standard. They

also

provide healthy food and education to their children.

On the other hand

, if

government

provide a basic

income

to all citizens,

then

the individual who is employed will get lazy. His motivation to get involved in any productive work will diminish.

Moreover

, there will be a huge financial burden on the

government

, which will lead to debt. The economy of the

government

will deteriorate. By providing a basic

income

to unemployed

individuals

, the

government

should indulge them in any social work so they do not depend on effortless

income

. In conclusion, the

government

should focus on the betterment of unemployed

individuals

by providing them with a fixed salary which will reduce the unemployment

rate

and improve their

life

Submitted by farhanmuhammad0011 on Wed Nov 02 2022

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

for example
for instance
to illustrate this
to give a clear example
such as
namely
to illustrate
take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

8
Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
5
Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0
Grammar mistakes
detected issues

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 6.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 6.0

Complete response

7.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

4 paragraphs

258 words

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

6.5
band
Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Living in a country where speaking a foreign language is required can provide both practical and social challenges. However, there is no set threshold for when these problems become serious problems. The social and practical effects of learning a second language in the host country will be discussed in this article, which will conclude that while there are always going to be social and practical difficulties, the degree of those difficulties varies widely depending on the situation and does not necessarily lead to grave errors. This can affect many aspects of daily life, from communication to career opportunities and even mental health.
6
band
With the increasing use and development of new technology, many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform. DO ADV >< DISADV
There is a phenomenon of mechanical workers dominating the workforce. The writer indicates that the drawbacks of increasing unemployment rates are outweighed by the benefit of boosting productivity and new product creation
6.5
band
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some claim that professionals ought to work in the countries where they did their training, others believe that anyone will be able to migrate to another country to work. From my point of view, both of the given arguments have their merits but I would lean toward the latter.
7.5
band
Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can ben taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion.
Some people argue that human activity negatively impacts biodiversity globally. A few have a notion that there is no scope for change and on the other side many believe that possible actions can bring change.
4.5
band
Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
In the era of technology boom, not only adults are seen on their phones more often than ever but also children because of the variety of knowledge and entertainment these devices can provide. In my opinion, it has a negative impact on children as it is distracting pupils from study other than to improve their study performance.

The government should give each citizen a basic income so that they have enough money to live on, even if they are unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

With the increasing use and development of new technology, many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform. DO ADV >< DISADV

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can ben taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion.

Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?