It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays, high-quality technologies have allowed communities to go to many places with different kinds of natural habitats. While
this
trend has some disadvantages, I would argue that the benefits far outweigh its drawbacks. There are some problems caused by travellers when coming to natural surroundings.
Firstly
, a high rate of visitors can cause serious environmental degradation to the destinations.
For example
, some tourists may litter the habitat, which gradually leads to the habitat destruction of many animals and their extinction. There is a risk of using the remote surroundings for mining resources companies which brings about negative affection for nature.
Furthermore
, some failed experiments of scientists in the natural
environment
can pollute and destroy that place. The reason is that these experiments can consist of many because of their toxic chemicals and dangerous viruses, which can cause a negative impact on the
environment
.
However
, there are significant benefits which are far more significant than the disadvantages.
First
, the exploration of different natural habitats can expand the knowledge of the public about the natural world. If scientists can control the diversity of our
environment
, they will find suitable places for creating alternative energy sources, which help people achieve sustainable development and lessen their dependence on fossil fuels.
As a result
, people can reduce the pollutants and their carbon footprint.
Besides
, exploring the natural
environment
can broaden biologists' knowledge about the
environment
. It gives biologists valuable experiences in a certain habitat.
Consequently
. these experiences give them countless opportunities to pursue higher knowledge about a certain
environment
, which contributes to their research. In conclusion, it seems to me that the advantages of visiting the remote habitats of nature far outweigh the drawbacks.
Submitted by tienduongftu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: