Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new dedicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is probably wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of the benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, using

animals

for

experiments

to test product security has become a heated debate currently. While it is believed to be wrong because of ethical issues, many people regard it as a legal action due to

benefits

Correct article usage

the benefits

show examples

it brings to

humans'

Change noun form

humans

show examples

lives. On the one hand, it is understandable why many people agree with animal tests. They believe that

animals

are lower on the evolutionary chart compared to human beings. There is a ton of pills which have been invented but not used as they didn't experience testing processes. As the result, they can cause dire repercussions for users

such

as severe allergy, vomiting or even death.

Thus

, it is acceptable to do

experiments

on

animals

for the security of pills.

For example

, puppies are prevalent in laboratories all over the world due to the same structure in the human body and many renowned pills have been proven to be successful thanks to them including antibiotics or vaccines.

On the other hand

, I believe that

humans

shouldn't use

animals

for studies or operations.

Animals

can think and have the same feeling as

humans

. They can feel cold, hot, freezing, sweltering and painful.

Thus

, people should put their positions in those of them before carrying out inhuman

experiments

on them.

Besides

, killing a single species will break ecological systems. The natural food chain cycle will be seriously damaged,

therefore

, leading to a massive extinction. In conclusion, even though animal tests are beneficial to

humans

in some ways, I still believe these inhuman

experiments

should be forbidden from now on.