Wild animals have no place in the 21th century. So protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

In current times there are some
people
who believe that
animals
in the wild should not be protected from being harmed or killed since
this
would be a waste of resources. I personally disagree with
this
statement, since each wildlife serves a purpose for our globe when it comes to nature and climate.
First
of all, if humankind on
this
planet were to stop protecting wild
animals
, it would change our environment in a negative way. There are many species that are crucial for our planet, and some of them serve the purpose to provide food for
people
living on Earth.
For example
, Bees are creatures that are producing pollen by eating nectar from flowers and other plants which they
then
make honey from. If they were to be extinct, our world would not be able to produce a lot of the food humans and
animals
are consuming daily.
This
would lead to more
animals
starving or dying which would
then
affect us
people
.
Furthermore
, it has shown that wildlife
that is
being killed and eaten has affected our climate in a harmful way.
This
caused more deadly diseases to spread all over the world and made more individuals and
animals
sick.
For instance
, in ,China they are killing wild bats that have been spreading a virus called Covid 19.
This
was a deadly disease that killed millions of
people
and
animals
in the wild. In conclusion, if we do not keep our wildlife protected it will cause harm to nature and the climate which will
then
continue to have a bad impact on other creatures living on planet Earth.
Submitted by Andrea Barreto on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: