Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources (internet or television). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that teachers provide
students
with greater academic efficiency compared to other platforms. Personally, I concur with
this
point of view due to many reasons which will be explained in the essay below. Granted, technological gadgets are believed to be educationally advantageous due to two main reasons. The
first
one is that they are usually used to display graphically appealing photos and movies, rendering
students
whose curiosity and imagination are developing to pay great attention to the delivered content. When learning with optimal focus, youngsters are likely to have more intellectual acquisition, giving rise to their brainpower development and improved memory. Another contributor to
this
viewpoint is that convenience can be a facilitator because
students
can revise many lessons using only one technology-based piece of equipment without carrying conventional books or notebooks. Should it not be for easy accessibility, young people will not consolidate their knowledge willingly,
hence
better academic performance.
However
, those benefits pale in comparison with teachers’ roles because of the following ideas. One of them is that eligible individuals with well-trained methodology can efficiently conduct interactive activities, namely debates or presentation groups, entailing a higher probability of communication amongst
students
. The more they interact with their peers, the more efficiently their brains work, which is not the case for one-way interactive applications.
Secondly
, it is the teachers that can adopt different pedagogical methods when noticing confusion from
students
due to face-to-face interaction, engendering optimization of learners’ intellectual capacity.
This
could be exemplified by primary children whose cognition is not fully developed and whose concentration is poor usually demand different teaching styles to engage in the lessons excitingly. In conclusion,
although
technical devices can contribute to learners’ learning progress to some extent, teachers can exert more significant impacts in the same regard.
Submitted by happyhihihehe on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays: