The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial perspective heating up a debate over whether the

price

of

fuel

should be raised to solve the world’s environmental problems. While

this

opinion is valid to some extent, I do not consider myself an advocate of it. Without a shadow of a doubt, increasing the

fuel

price

is not the optimal tactic to resolve environmental issues. Because all vehicles run on gas, residents have inelastic demand for oil.

Therefore

, even if the

price

is ever-increasing, people still buy petrol for their means of transport.

For instance

,

although

the Vietnamese government has just rise the cost of

fuel

, citizens do not mean to stop purchasing it. Since going to school or to work are daily tasks, an increase in

fuel

cost makes no difference in reducing the number of transportation.

Hence

, increasing oil prices is not an effective way to protect the environment. While

an

Correct article usage

the

show examples

ineffective impact of the growth in the

fuel

price

is widely acknowledged, there is a wealth of more far-reaching alternatives to address environmental problems

such

as utilizing electric hybrid vehicles. On the grounds that they need renewable energy thereby they do not release massive exhaust emissions and harm the air quality.

For example

, Vinfast, a notorious car

make

Replace the word

maker

show examples

in Vietnam, produces a system of vehicles that use electricity not only to meet dwellers’ requirements but

also

to redress environmental problems.

Thus

, applying

this

kind of vehicle is one of the most efficient methods to deteriorate CO2. To sum up, it is not necessary for the

fuel

price

to be increased but adopting other approaches is essential.