Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited. To what extent do you agree?

It is argued

Change preposition

by

show examples

some people that genetic engineering is used more in the

last

few years, and it should be limited because it has a severe effect on our lives. I totally disagree because it is an excellent solution to some of our problems,

such

as medicine and agriculture. It is clear that Genetic engineering is the practice of manipulating the gene of the organism. It is used to produce crops that are more resistant to insects and diseases.

Also

, some genetically modified crops grow more quickly;

in other words

, Now plants can produce more fruit more quickly.

This

achievement means that more harvests are guaranteed

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

so that more people can be fed.

For example

, a report in a weekly health magazine, in April 2015, showed that there was a dramatic increase in food supplements due to using genetic engineering in agriculture. Another reason why I believe that genetic engineering is beneficial is that scientists may use it to cure because some drugs and vaccines are produced by genetic engineering.

In addition

, I think that some inherited illnesses would no longer exist.

For instance

, a health organization report in march 2016 showed that a large proportion of drugs are produced by using genetic engineering. And that's driving to healthier and longer lives for people. To conclude, despite the argument that genetic engineering is used a lot, I think that

this

is a positive trend as a plethora of advantages to using

this

technique to improve our lives by solving some problems in health and agriculture.