Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

It is argued that several

museums

charge for admission whereas some of them are serving for free.

Although

entering the

museums

at a certain charge of money offers numerous advantages,

further

considerations show that it

also

has some drawbacks.

First

of all, well-organised advertisements have an important role to make

museums

more attractive to the public.

Moreover

, the

museums

and related events serve the particular part of people who are interested in

this

field and the marketing of the items, and ideas that

museums

include should be quality.

For example

,

museums

which are well-designed, decorated and clean reflect the value that authorities are given to the goods and their producers. Because of that, paying money for the entrance to the

museums

indicates that the work for doing here is excellent and people can be satisfied. The disadvantage of the

museums

is that are not cost-free, it demonstrates that these places are just focusing on a typical part of society and

this

does not match the perspective of

art

.

In other words

, the

museums

that reflect the

art

, historical items and special parts of the different traditions are not suitable for the public and

this

can cause ethnic problems.

For instance

, if a student who tends to visit the

museums

related to her domain can not enter because of the prices,

this

situation prevents her enhancement according to habits. For

this

reason, paid

museums

can not bring benefits in terms of society's general idea about

art

, traditions or their domains. In conclusion, there are numerous

museums

that charge for admission while some are cost-free. In my opinion, paying money for

museums

has its negative and positive sides which affect people's perspectives and main ideas of

art

.