In
this
abrupt era, well-being issues are a common debate. Many folks are suffering from low
fitness
levels because of consuming excessive
junk
food
.
While manyCorrect word choice
show examples
people
opine that
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
should incur extra duty on it so that the public can avoid these foods.
However
, I completely disagree with
this
given notion.
This
essay intends to explicate my views by taking instances to demonstrate my points and prove my arguments.
To begin
with, society is suffering from
fitness
issues just because eating fast
food
is the wrong way of thinking. The first and foremost, factor is a sedentary lifestyle
that is
deteriorating public
fitness
mostly rather than
junk
feed.
People
spentWrong verb form
show examples
many hours in offices sitting in one place which leads to
other Correct word choice
show examples
fatigue.
For example
,
people
in the IT sector
spentWrong verb form
show examples
a huge amount of time sitting on chairs which causes health concerns
such
as backache and many more. Actually, fast
food
is saving
people
time ,especially those who have short breaks
while
they are on duty.
Moreover
, the public must be health-centric despite, working against the clock, they must arrange a time for
fitness
activities if companies can have yoga sessions for their employee before starting their job. The public
whomCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
residents in countryside areas do not have even knowledge about fast
food
but still
suffersCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
from energy issues.
Therefore
, blaming
junk
meals for society's poor
fitness
doesVerb problem
show examples
not
fareVerb problem
show examples
debate.
On the other ,hand I have a few more points to support my arguments.
Firstly
,
instead
of imposing an extra levy on fast
food
,
GovernmentCorrect article usage
show examples
must enforce local laws as most quick meal chains are
franchise baseCorrect your spelling
show examples
. Local Authorities supervise them and they must mention the calories in each item in order to the public awareness.
Furthermore
, they must campaign about daily calorie intake for a person
according to
their respective age. For ,example humans require approximately 2000 calories in a day more than that can
leadsChange the verb form
show examples
to obesity if consumed every day. In fact, if
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
incur extra tax on fast foods that can not only loss in the economy but
also
in the area of employment.
Hence
, imposing an extra tax is not the solution to improve public health.
In conclusion, weighing all the above points
although
junk
snacks
isChange the verb form
show examples
rich in high calories
yet Correct word choice
show examples
I strongly assert that condemning fast foods for poor health and imposing the tax.