Some people argue that student should read histry in school,other opine that they should read technology. discuss both views and give your opinio.

#people #student #histry #school #opine #technology #opinio

Reading helps to gain knowledge, which can be passed down to others and self to flourish the skills. It is believed by some that history should be read by the pupil at school while others argue that it is best to opt for

technology

.I will discuss both perspectives in the upcoming paragraphs.I believe that

this

two are mandatory for a better future. The main reason why some people are in favour of past events is that it creates enthusiasm in the young generation. Learning about the old heroes and their role model brings good deeds to society.In other ,words Abdul Kalam our former president of India is an inspiration due to his hard work and positive attitude. So, people following him makes a good community.

Secondly

, it serves as a warning sign to never repeat the same mistakes.

For instance

, the world war created hazards to many lives.

On the other hand

, why some favours

technology

because technical skills aid in better job placement.In the computerised era, everything is

technology

based and students who are good at

technology

end up in better work.

Moreover

, it

also

makes human life easier.

For example

, an invention like the washing machine reduces the work of women at home.

Thus

technology

cannot be avoided it is a part of life. While I believe that, reading machinery and history changes life ,especially our future. Knowing past events and changing all those mistakes with new technical skills help us to grow. So ,in , the classroom both should be included. In summary,I concede that reading history has its own benefits like building up of new society by changing our mistakes and automation aids in better job placement and easy tasks in activity, both should not be moved and to be an important part of the curriculum.

Submitted by jessgeorge97 on Thu Dec 08 2022

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

8Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
1Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Grammar mistakes
 

5 paragraphs

297 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 8.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 6.5

Complete response

6.5

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

6
band
Directors and managers of organization are often older people. Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying the fact that manager levels are often elderly communities. While it is commonly held belief that it is better for young people to become leaders in organisations, there is also an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that young nations should have a chance to be at the managerial level.
7.5
band
Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day. Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?
There is no denying the fact that these days, there are modern ways to work. While it is a commonly held belief that it would be better if the employees worked from their homes instead of travelling every day to their workplace, there is also an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that there are many benefits of working from home.
<4
band
Some people are very strict about their school uniforms and the apprearance of their pupils, while other schools have a relaxed dress cod
In this modern era, it is increasingly common in most universities that students can wear dress as per their comfort zone. Some schools are extremely strict about their uniforms, and they want children to follow them. In this essay, I will explain the merits and demerits.
5
band
3)Although countries with long average working hours are economically successful, this often has some negative social consequences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is increasing debate on whether longer duration of work is truly beneficial. While some believe that this model should continue on as it has shown to benefit a country's economic status, others, along with myself, diasgree with this sentiment as it can have negative effects on the physical and mental wellbeing of those in the workforce.
5.5
band
In many countries, truancy* is a worrying problem for both parents and educators. •What are the causes of truancy, and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community? •* truancy = the situation when a child pretends to go to school but in fact goes somewhere else, for example to play unsupervised. The verb is 'to play truant from school.'
Truancy is a significant concern for parents and tutors in several nations. The main problems this cause is harassment and finding the social stress from the classmates and the aftereffects would be bad behaviour of the child.

Some people argue that student should read histry in school,other opine that they should read technology. discuss both views and give your opinio.

Fully explain your ideas

Directors and managers of organization are often older people. Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day. Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?

Some people are very strict about their school uniforms and the apprearance of their pupils, while other schools have a relaxed dress cod

3)Although countries with long average working hours are economically successful, this often has some negative social consequences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?