It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that people, including scientists and tourists, can easily access off-the-beaten-track places like the South Pole these days. Yet, individuals hold polarized views on whether
this
technological advancement is beneficial or not. On a more personal level, I believe that the advantages of this
attitude outweigh its disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are some beliefs among people worldwide that paving the way has detrimentally been influencing the environmental preservation of remote natural environments. The first reason is that this
group highly debates that climate and ecosystem changes are rooted in the scientists' experiments and tourists' recreations. In other words
, because of sampling for scientific research, the genes of local habitats may be manipulated, as well as
hustling and bustling are more likely to result in deforestation and water contamination. Additionally
, those who will have been undertaking expeditions in the remote wilderness, where they litter, set a fire, and so forth, are capable of jeopardizing the beauty of this
untouched region.
However
, I would argue that these sorts of tourism industry and scientific exploration should be allowed as much as possible. Firstly
, we can effectively increase our encyclopedia of knowledge. In this
regard, thanks to social networks, satellites, and online websites, natural fans themselves find it easy to see these picturesque views and read scientific articles through those who are travellers and researchers, respectively. Secondly
, economic benefits and commercialization can potentially appear as a blessing in disguise. For example
, travelling and revolving in this
far-off environment requires related companies. So, many tourism companies, flight lines, and job seekers can profit, both directly and indirectly. It is undeniable that if there are no leaders and companies, adventurists and explorers will not see these places efficiently and safely.
In conclusion, although
some people would like to not drop the subject of outnumbering drawbacks of this
development, it seems to me that not only is this
theory not acceptable but also
this
attitude should strongly be supported.Submitted by TUTOO on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Include more specific examples to support your arguments, particularly in sections where you discuss potential environmental impacts and economic benefits. Specific examples can help strengthen your points and make your essay more persuasive.
coherence cohesion
Be careful with word choices and idiomatic expressions, like 'paving the way' or 'as a blessing in disguise', to ensure they fit the context appropriately. It is important to convey your arguments clearly without confusing the reader.
task achievement
The essay provides a balanced view of the topic by discussing both advantages and disadvantages, which shows a good understanding of the task.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion effectively frame the essay, with a clear stance presented in both sections.
coherence cohesion
Ideas are organized logically, with clear transitions between paragraphs that help guide the reader through your argument.