some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

There is a controversial argument about whether animal

experiments

Use synonyms

should or should not be implemented. Even these

experiments

Use synonyms

may bring benefits to human beings. I firmly believe, not all experimentation is negative for wildlife, some of them are compelling.

However

Linking Words

, we have to

instead

Linking Words

of

experiments

Use synonyms

that damage animal rights, as well figure out reasonable solutions which can adjust the harm.

Firstly

Linking Words

, the investigations in herds have more pertinently examples which do not hurt them and baneful instances which abuse them. We should remain that adequate

experiments

Use synonyms

and stop or alternate adverse animal research.

For instance

Linking Words

, investigators in order to finish the test and claim that will bring benefits to human life, so intend to kill

animals

Use synonyms

or ill them. In

this

Linking Words

case,

this

Linking Words

test should be outlawed and the public who cares about animal rights should agitate against

this

Linking Words

action.

In contrast

Linking Words

, if scientists just research animal safety and promise they will protect

animals

Use synonyms

' safety, as well as the discoveries from

experiments

Use synonyms

, will be of benefit to humans, these should be retained.

Thus

Linking Words

, prevail the acceptable examinations, and dismiss the abuses. Taking consider by baleful instances in animal

experiments

Use synonyms

, I suggest two efficient ways.

First

Linking Words

zoologists need the corpses of

animals

Use synonyms

so they can collect the already-died

animals

Use synonyms

rather than directly killing them. Meanwhile, zoologists

also

Linking Words

can monitor wildlife in the forest or other natural claims that will bring benefits to human life. In

this

Linking Words

case,

this

Linking Words

test should be outlawed and the public who cares about animal rights should be against

this

Linking Words

action.

In contrast

Linking Words

scientists research

animals

Use synonyms

and promise they will protect

animals

Use synonyms

' safety, as well as the discoveries from

experiments

Use synonyms

, will be of benefit to humans, these should be retained. In conclusion, not all experimentation on critters take adverse reactions in them, but we

also

Linking Words

need to discover and detect

experiments

Use synonyms

which are wound creatures, and these tests should be cut down by laws.