Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In modern society, how to convict a criminal has been under the spotlight for a while, with an ongoing debate over whether lawbreakers should be sentenced to a fixed
punishment
or in a flexible manner. In my opinion, environs always benefit greater from flexible
punishment
than from fixed ones. It is perhaps true in some conditions that handing criminals a fixed sentence could be a better approach. One possible reason lies in that being consistent with the fixed sentence in every case would serve as a deterrent to potential offenders, since it conveys a message that whoever breaks the law must be imposed a specific penalty with no fluke.
However
, if the penal decision primarily relays on judges or other public officials, offenders would have the propensity to pool all their resources, whether a fabricated criminal reason or their wealth and social status, to plead themselves innocent. Eventually, the fixed sentence would perpetuate the crime-ridden condition in our nation.
Therefore
, taking the circumstance of a crime and the criminals’ purpose into account can reflect the fairness and humanity of the law. To be precise, morality and humanity would be neglected, if deciding the
punishment
for the victims who just counterattack the perpetrators or kill them in self-defence in the cases of domestic violence and school bullying the same as that for serial killers. What is worse is the fact that people may be disappointed in the judicial system, even the whole of society.  In conclusion, it is too hasty a statement that persisting in fixed
punishment
would contribute to a crime-free society. Judges are supposed to take all the factors involving circumstance and motivation into account in the effort to punish criminals and maintain justice at the same time
Submitted by 215612999 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: