Many cities are now turning parks and farmland into new housing developments. Is this a positive or negative development?

It’s true that there are initiatives from
cities
to transform public parks and farms into residential
areas
. In my opinion, I am in complete disagreement with
this
contention despite the ostensible advantages in dense urban
areas
. Those who argue
this
policy is positive, point out its effects on overcrowding in
cities
. In the
last
century, migrations rose significantly in urban
areas
which caused a numerous density in the number of citizens. And one of the best solutions for
this
is to enlarge the size of the city by exploiting other lands
such
as gardens and farmlands. Meanwhile, some
cities
such
as Tokyo and Mexico tend to use more sophisticated approaches to deal with the surging population capacity of designated restricts by spreading to neighbouring lands.
Consequently
, individuals are able to live in
cities
and enjoy higher standards of living, better healthcare, improved economic opportunities, and various entertainment options. For the average resident,
such
development is incontestably positive.
However
, new housing developments should not take precedence over human fundamental priorities.
Firstly
, turning gardens and farmlands to build new houses not only deprive the residents of recreation and natural lands but
also
necessitates the transportation of agricultural products from greater distances. And the worst-case scenario is to exacerbate environmental issues and potentially lead to inflated food costs for the average person.
Secondly
,
cities
that lack parks is not providing an optimal living environment for society members. For ,affluents
this
is less pressing since they may be able to make frequent trips to outlying
areas
all over the world. Whereas for the least privileged classes parks are considerably their only opportunity to experience nature and replenish themselves. in conclusion, regardless of the positives related to population density in
cities
, it is negative in the aggregate due to its effect on the natural environment and quality of life in
cities
.
Such
proposals should
therefore
be pursued in moderation.
Submitted by muntagsuheel55 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: