Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty-five can continue to live full and active lives. In what step can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make?

Nowadays, excessive improvements in health services are considered an indispensable factor in our lives;

consequently

, the health of older people getting better and can continue to live full and active lives over the age of sixty-five.

This

essay will examine the pros and cons of

this

and provide a logical conclusion.

Firstly

, the main disadvantage can be titled as "higher pension age",

accordingly

it will be fewer opportunities in the market for younger members and

this

can result in a higher unemployment rate.

For example

, each organisation has a limited number of employees and

therefore

most of them will be over sixty.

Next

, another drawback can be defined as "fewer resources". It goes without saying that, our planet has limited sources for living;

hence

, the resources will be negatively affected and will not distribute over all living creatures including human beings.

For instance

, there is a limited agricultural area for various crops with limited water sources

such

as rivers and for sure cannot fulfil all people's needs in

this

case.

Secondly

, there are many advantages to higher living age.

For example

, we can use elder experience across many fields as having some folks doing the same job for years will be resulted in better processes and enhance the quality of life.

Moreover

, another benefit related to the emotional side will result.

For instance

, if we have advanced medicines, we will have less suffering for our beloved families. To conclude, due to the aforementioned reasons, we may safely conclude that the positive impact of improvements in the health of older people far outweighs the drawbacks

although

it may have some pressure on other elements

such

as resources and jobs.