In many cities, there are areas of land that are used as parks. With increasing population levels, these areas would be better used to provide more housing. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, the population in each country tends to increase every single year despite the

space

area remaining the same. In most of the country , there is

space

to use as a

park

while some

people

suggest that the area of

parks

should be replaced by housing with the growth of population. In my point of view, I totally disagree with

this

statement as the

parks

are the place for citizens to gather and socialize.

Moreover

, the housing should be adaptable. Regarding the advantages of the

park

, most

parks

are situated in the centre of the town.The purpose is to gather

people

to relax and socialize in

this

space

.

For example

, in Thailand, the

park

occupies by groups of

people

gathering and spending their leisure time together.They come and join activities

such

as throwing a picnic party, riding a bicycle ,running or even doing dance workouts together.

Therefore

,

people

are spending time together and being more socialised by meeting each other and the most convenient place is the

park

.

On the other hand

, there are additional ways to eliminate the lack of spacing. The housing should be adaptable to fit in small spaces

such

as changing from low-rise to high-rise condominiums.

For instance

, Singapore is one of the significant countries to learn about.They re-arrange their small

space

and make every

space

countable and still have green

space

at the centre of the city. In conclusion, there are many ways to solve the lack of area problems

instead

of replacing the

parks

.

Moreover

, the advantage of

parks

outweighs the disadvantages.

Hence

, I absolutely disagree with

this

argument.