Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of arts by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Art
plays a vital role in expressing thoughts to others. Many folks are interested to learn arts despite the growth of technology and science in today's world.
However
, some people argue that folks can learn about
art
by glancing at historical objects and works of
art
by using a computer
instead
of attending the organization. In my opinion, the statement does not appear to be more rational. In
this
monograph, I will discuss more details and
thus
lead to a logical conclusion. There is adequate evidence
that is
obtainable for substantiated reasons. The top-notch concrete reason is that attending public museums and
art
galleries would get depth knowledge about arts rather than blue screens.
In addition
, many students might chance to pursue the subject of
art
as the mainstream.
For instance
, In recent times, scientists found unknown languages by examing historic paintings.
Furthermore
, all the data related to
art
on the computer are unreliable content. Needless to say, all these points stand in good stead. The rearmost coherent factor that cannot be neglected is that visiting an
art
gallery will help us to understand culture and tradition, especially tourists.
On the other hand
, people don't need to worry about entrance fees, they can view historical objects on computers.
Moreover
, reduce financial burdens on local authorities to maintain historical places.
Hence
, it's apparent why many people are supporting in favour of
this
trend. In recapitulation, I reiterate that there are innumerable factors supporting attending historical events to gain more knowledge and new experiences by seeing unique creativity in the person.
Consequently
, I firmly agree with the given statement.
Submitted by dhivyaravi0396 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: