families have more people in the past because they have more children. Do you think there are more advantages than disadvantages to being in a large family in the past

It is thought that some have bigger families as they had more children in the olden days. I totally agree with

this

argument.

However

, it contains both pros and cons. Let's have a look at them.

Firstly

, in the older generation, most communities had agriculture as their occupation, which led to the need for workers or helping hands at

home

.

For Example

, in India, people used to have 10 to 12 offspring at

home

, which would allow them to have a helping hand as the

kids

grew. It's considered in some parts of the world having a large family brings them pride in society and shows their community strength.

However

,

this

will not be helpful in raising

kids

with more care.

Secondly

, having said that, large families share their domestic duties but maintaining

such

a huge crowd at

home

and supplying the basics need's would take a lot of effort.

For Instance

, in our country, many children were deprived of school because their parents could not afford to learn for all the

kids

at house.

Besides

, Government provides free literacy; some children need more attention at

home

to complete their studies due lack of attention at house.

Furthermore

, as we see having more population within the same roof was a clear disadvantage as caretakers end up having heavy-duty to raise

kids

and have more expenses to maintain the little ones and provide them with a good study.To illustrate, we see as the family started getting schooling, slowly drifted to have nuclear and small families which help the head of the family to have easy maintenance. In conclusion, In the olden era, folk lacked knowledge of how effective and composed to have a small family.In my view,