Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historic objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There is no doubt that the public can access artworks through computers.
Therefore
, it has been suggested that there is no need for
museums
and
galleries
.
However
, I strongly disagree with
this
statement. Admittedly,
people
can appreciate a piece of artwork through a computer, whereas
people
who visit offline
museums
and
galleries
can have a firsthand visiting involvement which engages more senses,
such
an experience can leave visitors with a great impression of what they have visited and given them a better understanding of the historical artefact.
For example
, if you visited the Great Wall only via a computer, you would not sense the changing times through the faded colour and might not understand how hard it is to build up the heritage.
However
, if you visited the historical site yourself, you would have a firsthand understanding of what had been written in the books. While computers may help
people
somehow gain a firsthand experience by using AI technology someday,
galleries
and
museums
can offer other benefits which are non-replaceable. The venues for appreciating artworks are not only for visiting purposes, the spaces can
also
assist
people
to meet others who share the same interest as them.
Moreover
, cultural heritages will be better preserved due to the charging of admission fees of
museums
and
galleries
. In conclusion, based on the evidence analyzed, despite computers can somehow help
people
who live in remote areas to see historical objects or artworks online, offline
galleries
and
museums
still attach great importance due to their benefits and should not suffer from disappearance.
Submitted by wly_yanwang on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • virtual
  • digital
  • online
  • accessibility
  • inclusivity
  • cultural heritage
  • physical experience
  • immersion
  • local tourism
  • economy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: