Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?

Some argue that primary and secondary education is mostly focused on facts and figures

rather

Change the article

arather

show examples

development of life skills. I completely agree with

this

view as experienced during student life, learning through books rather than task-oriented syllabus. These facts will be discussed with my opinion in subsequent paragraphs.

To begin

with, the whole education period is facilitated with books, journals and readily available

study

sources produced by scholars or authors due to easiness to meet within the given time period at the

study

centre with limited resources. For an instance, theories and findings are easy to cover within a given term or semester.

As a result

, the product of the process will be merely a student who learned other’s findings and studies rather

Secondly

, practical experience is to be concentrated since it enhanced the ability of the students to engage with creative thinking and applicability of learnings. Despite the difficulty to adapt within a limited

study

period, rational thinking and active participation in extra-curricular work are in demand for a reformation of the education system. For an instance, more primary

study

centres in South Korea have restricted their

study

plan with more focus on professional skills

such

as Bakery, Welding, Plumbing, Construction and Framing at School. In conclusion, more people have understood the benefit of practical learning aspects over time . As I believe, learning only theories will not ensure a capable person in

future

Add an article

a future

show examples

life but rather a simple follower of existing theories.