It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Would the drawbacks be greater than benefits to the community and the young adults themselves? – real-life experience [facilitate to develop interpersonal skills] - reduce the time available for studies.

A young adult should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the neighbourhood. Different individual has

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

different opinion, based on what the own prospect and point of view they have. But the key point is why 'Required?' In my opinion, nobody has the power or right to ask or force someone to do things by moral target, which is not one of the obligations of in-laws. On one hand, assisting the public can aid in developing interpersonal skills,

also

known as social abilities. Those who support young adults in performing community service believe it is crucial for their growth and development.

For instance

, in Westmount, a well-known community in Montreal, there is a program that allows teenagers to clear snow from the roads every Sunday morning during winter.

This

program has been in place for a long time and has had positive impacts on local young adults. But

on the other hand

, paying too much attention or overrating the effects of

this

idea is definitely unacceptable.

For instance

, several Chinese cities forced not to encourage the student of high schools to help the local seniors with cleaning or cooking at weekends. It looks so warm and kind, but these duties occupied the rest time of the students. Helping seniors is right, but is it

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

mandatory?

Furthermore

, should a moral target be required in these actions? I am holding a negative attitude.

However

, everything has a double edge.

Nevertheless

, helping people in public societies is a good thing for people in their 20ish, but the enforcement and moral requirement are not acceptable absolutely. Even though the different group has their opinion but they need to make a judgement by discrete consideration.