Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

These days, public debate has been going on over to eat meat or fish should be avoided

instead

Linking Words

of other kinds of meals. I tend to agree

that is

Linking Words

better to eat only fruits or vegetables than products with animal origins - for the following reasons. Three main factors support the idea of

this

Linking Words

change

Use synonyms

in alimentation habits should be motivated. The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that the production process of vegetables,

such

Linking Words

as farms or crops, is less aggressive to our environment than creating animals because the recovery of the area is not only faster but

also

Linking Words

costs less space.

Additionally

Linking Words

, because of the high rate of gas emission by these animals with high weight, which is the cows and bulls in the bigger fraction, our planet has been suffering climate

change

Use synonyms

. A

third

Linking Words

reason is that there is no fair comparison of how healthier the meals without meat are

instead

Linking Words

than is extracted from animals or fish. I admit that the decreasing of consuming meat or fish would be a matter for the economy of some countries. Despite that,

this

Linking Words

is a tendency that these large productions must adapt and

change

Use synonyms

their ways of working to find a way to produce more plant derivates. In conclusion, I would argue that a diet based on green life is the best path to be followed by our society.

Accordingly

Linking Words

, it would be generally advisable for the government to improve

this

Linking Words

culture, by reducing taxes in order to motivate

this

Linking Words

change

Use synonyms

.