Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is considered by many that doctors and engineers should work for the same country, where they train and get experience. Other people believe that they should be allowed to work in any specific country
according to
their own will. In my opinion, everyone has a right to move and work where he can find more opportunities for himself.
To start with, this
is certainly true that specialists in any profession are assets in any nation. They are the source of advancements in numerous sectors, for instance
, they improve the overall
economy through infrastructure, medical innovations and various IT events. In Japan, the government trained more than 1000 engineers for construction projects. As a result
, those engineers built tunnels and bridges in hilly areas to promote six million tourists per year. Similarly
, in developed countries
, graduates play a significant role in the latest technologies after training in their countries
.
On the other hand
, professionals are facing a lot of problems in their countries
after getting skills and training. They are unable to find employment in their countries
. For example
, there are more than 60 thousand graduates per year who complete their degrees in various fields. After that, they cannot pursue their career because the government is only facilitating half of them. Hence
, they should be given chance
to find a secure future in any other nation.
Correct article usage
a chance
To conclude
, it is a need of the moment for any nation to produce experienced workers, so they can pay close attention to the latest advancements. It should also
be the utmost priority of the government to facilitate them otherwise
they should be allowed to migrate to any other particular country.Submitted by muhammadbilalkhan932 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Task Response: The candidate has addressed both views and given their opinion, but the response lacks depth and development. The points are not fully explored, and the argumentation is somewhat superficial.
coherence and cohesion
Coherence and Cohesion: There is evidence of an attempt at logical progression of ideas, but the organization is weak. The essay lacks a clear introduction and conclusion, and the development of supporting points is somewhat disjointed. The candidate should work on structuring the essay more effectively to improve coherence and cohesion.