Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With the advancement of modern technology and globalisation, several people think that the latest science related to lawbreaker forensics should be applied to investigate past precedents.
This
essay completely agrees with the given statement for some reasons,which are explained below.
To begin
with, it is important to acknowledge that technical knowledge provides us with some specific facts and solutions to the possible problems in our society as an applied science is capable of delivering new insights and evidence that could lead to justice for victims and their families.
This
may lead to accurate and reliable methods of analysis,
such
as DNA testing and fingerprint analysis, which can be used to re-examine old common law and potentially identify suspects or exonerate those who were wrongly convicted.
On the other hand
, the majority of individuals say that there are some potential limitations and challenges associated with working modish high-tech to glance at former cases.
For example
, the quality and integrity of the original evidence may have been broken or lost over time, making it difficult or impossible to obtain accurate results.
Additionally
, the original investigation and trial may have been conducted with different standards and protocols, making it difficult to compare the new and old evidence. In conclusion, I prefer that operating current hi-tech to focus on previous cases is a valuable and important endeavour, as it can supply recent perceptions and verification that could lead to honour for the sufferer and their menages.
However
, it is important to approach
such
cases with caution and to consider the obstacles and dilemmas associated with utilizing up-to-date machinery to re-examine bygone proof
Submitted by Alma Islam on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • forensics
  • accuracy
  • guilt
  • innocence
  • uncovering
  • evidence
  • investigation
  • analysis
  • reliability
  • ethical concerns
  • high costs
  • re-evaluating
What to do next:
Look at other essays: