There are controversial perspectives heating up a debate over the tactics to deal with myriads of old constructions.
While
some claim that numerous antique Linking Words
buildings
must be retained in order to preserve, the opposite makes a statement that people need to destroy old Use synonyms
buildings
to give their place for the new ones. Use synonyms
While
the former is valid to some extent, I consider myself an advocate of the latter.
Without a shadow of a doubt, it is vital for the government to protect a bunch of old Linking Words
buildings
which play the important role of a historical nation. Given the fact thatUse synonyms
,
people can know more about the milestones upon which different civilizations were built. Remove the comma
apply
For example
, the Viet Nam National Museum of History is preserved for more than 90 years so as to retain a lot of books which are relative to the historical nation. Linking Words
As a result
, defending many old Linking Words
buildings
is taken into consideration.
Use synonyms
While
the importance of the ancient towers is widely acknowledged, the national authorities should destroy them which bar the country from developing. Because the high demand for land to live off the citizens is ever-increasing and myriads of old towers cannot meet the demand of the residents. So pulling down can resolve these serious problems. Linking Words
For instance
, Royal Linking Words
city
and Times city experience great changes from the small area without top-notch facilities to the housing complex. Change the capitalization
City
Thus
, destroying the pre-existing places is necessary for adding accommodations.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
preserving the historical sites are put into Linking Words
the
priority, the government should consider replacing them with new houses or offices in order not to discourage the country from flourishing.Correct article usage
a
hominhtrang995