Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for commiting it , should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give yor own opinion.

A certain amount of individuals think that there must be a permanent type of consequence for every type of misdoing.
Although
this
is not a straightforward argument, there are other portions of individuals who believe that the reasons behind the crime should be taken into consideration with regard to the disciplinary action towards the wrongdoing.
This
essay will dissect both viewpoints and will be followed by an opinion and conclusion. On one hand, a lot of people who committed different offences, may it be petty or massive, usually receive a similar ample amount of
years
to serve in prison. What I mean by
this
is that no matter what kind of misconduct they do, they are bound to be in an enclosed cell with everybody else.
For example
, a father who stole a few pieces of bread in a bakeshop was sentenced to three
years
in prison, in comparison to a murderer who acquired four
years
in the same cell. The amount of time they have to spend behind the bars is almost the same, compared to the weight of their wrongdoings.
On the other hand
, wrongdoers always have various motives on why they commit bad acts. There must be categorization applied to the system in terms of the types of penalties that an individual should receive because of the crime they did.
For example
, those petty criminals
such
as stealers in supermarkets or convenience stores should be disciplined by cleaning all the parks and gardens in the area.
In addition
, those who killed someone should serve longer
years
to repent from their misdeed. In
this
way, justice for everyone is given fair and squarely. As far as I am concerned,
this
is an important issue that must be assessed by the officials and government to provide a fair justice system in the entire community. In conclusion, a number of people reckon offenders should receive the same consequences regardless of the weight of their crime,
whereas
the opposition believes that there must be a category and fair judgement towards their actions, especially for petty criminals.
This
can be addressed by the government to appease both portions.
Submitted by mjdf0930 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • fixed punishments
  • consistency
  • fairness
  • legal proceedings
  • deterrent
  • bias
  • universally unacceptable
  • tailored
  • rehabilitative approaches
  • nuanced understanding
  • socio-economic background
  • mental health
  • prior victimization
  • rehabilitation
  • reintegration
  • root causes
  • recidivism
  • baseline
  • discretion
  • complex human elements
What to do next:
Look at other essays: