Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

For many years most developed

countries

have helped the poorest ones to afford the situation in various ways. Unfortunately, the sending of money does not resolve

this

deal but maybe if rich

countries

contribute

also

with other types of help, it can be reduced more.

This

essay will argue why financial aid is useful

although

is not the only way to support poor

countries

and why I strongly agree with

this

notion. Poverty cannot be solved only by finances from other

countries

. Often, these capitals do have not specific destinations and they are used, in general, to buy basic foods but never to invest and produce, which is the same as alms which develop a dependent spirit.

For example

, it would be useful to teach the population agricultural techniques and produce corn and various types of cereals. How a developed country can support an indigent country are multiple, and if we use it well, we can make a difference. Small charity centres like churches and associations provide food, clothes or medical cures,

also

building schools, and finding volunteer doctors who can make vaccines would be extremely helpful.

For example

, you can adopt a child at distance and the federation elected, send you all the details of

this

child…photos of him growing up or some draws made by him,

this

type of help allows the young boy to receive an adequate education. In conclusion, it is a great idea to focus

also

on different supports

it is clear that

we cannot remove financial aid,

this

would be crazy, but we have to expand our horizons and find solutions for the long term. It’s my hope to see

this

change.