Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many sectors have progressed in the way they function with the advancement of science and technology. Some states that incorporating advanced technology in the present will be helpful in finding forensic evidence of criminal offences that happened in the past. In
this
essay, I will discuss how scientific evidence helps in solving past crimes and the reason why some may be against
this
notion. On one hand, high-tech devices can help in solving unresolved crimes in the past.
For example
, DNA and fingerprint analysis are two main methods that are used in homicidal investigations and their ability to provide plenty of details just by using an intricate element like one tiny hair strand or a drop of blood has revolutionized criminal forensic investigations.
Furthermore
, these devices can provide accurate and efficient data which will be beneficial during a criminal investigation
thus
, narrowing down the disparity of wrongful accusations and serving justice to the victims.
On the other hand
, digging around a criminal investigation of the past is overwhelming and mentally torturing to the victim’s family.
For example
, it takes decades for families to move on after a loss of an individual or a beloved item of theirs. Even a slight trigger could be detrimental to the mental health of those who are living in the present day, so, some families are gravitating towards finding closure rather than finding the real criminal. Using new approaches of science to solve past crimes is suggested by a few. These scientifically advanced theories may help in generating sequences that are highly specific in narrowing down the murder suspects.
However
, some may refuse to use these techs as they have already found closure in their past tragedies. So, using new gadgets in resolving past criminal activities have both benefits and drawbacks which should be addressed.
Submitted by Nimz on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • forensics
  • accuracy
  • guilt
  • innocence
  • uncovering
  • evidence
  • investigation
  • analysis
  • reliability
  • ethical concerns
  • high costs
  • re-evaluating
What to do next:
Look at other essays: