In recent years, a debate regarding government financial
for
has emerged.
, some people argue that the funds used to help
would be more useful if spent
. In my opinion,
to some extent
view is true, some kind of
for
is important. In
essay, a brief explanation of the matter will be given.
It is undoubtedly true that financially supporting
can be important for the population too. In fact, few will dispute the role of
in everyday life, since more or less everyone benefits from artistic production.
, the majority of the community listens to some music during the day, and many singers have been helped by the government during their careers.
, without
public expenditure, many performers would have withdrawn because of financial issues before getting recognised. Given the fundamental impact of
in society and the need for help, especially at the beginning of their careers, of
, it is not entirely inaccurate to affirm that the capital spent on these projects is not wasted.
, it could be said that
should earn money for themselves and there is more need for public funding in other sectors. Indeed, it could be argued that, if the
is great, the population will directly back it in many manners,
as by buying it or going to events. Meanwhile giving out large sums of money to everyone, is only giving hope to people who will not emerge.
,
has been the case for a large number of visual
that lived only thanks to projects issued by city councils,
nearly no one was interested in their work.
, there are other sectors, in which every penny is important, that could benefit more from public funds.
could be the case with social security, where there is a desperate need for
that really helps to improve some people's life. Considering all these issues,
funding for
should be at least limited.
In conclusion, I think that it is important to
, but that
should be limited. As stated above, there are too many
who cannot sustain themselves with their productions and they should simply have to find another path in life because giving money to them is only a burden.
, government-funded events can be an occasion for someone to gain recognition, so
type of
should not be cancelled. For these reasons, the
should be in form of giving spaces where performers can promote themselves, and not direct financing.