In recent years, a debate regarding government financial 
 for 
 has emerged. 
, some people argue that the funds used to help 
 would be more useful if spent 
. In my opinion, 
 to some extent 
 view is true, some kind of 
 for 
 is important. In 
 essay, a brief explanation of the matter will be given.
It is undoubtedly true that financially supporting 
 can be important for the population too. In fact,  few  will dispute the role of 
 in everyday life, since more or less everyone benefits from artistic production. 
, the majority of the community listens to some music during the day, and many singers have been helped by the government during their careers. 
, without 
 public expenditure, many performers would have withdrawn because of financial issues before getting recognised. Given the fundamental impact of 
 in society and the need for help, especially at the beginning of their careers, of 
, it is not entirely inaccurate to affirm that the capital spent on these projects is not wasted.
, it could be said that 
 should earn money for themselves and there is more need for public funding in other sectors. Indeed, it could be argued that, if the 
 is great, the population will directly back it in many manners, 
 as by buying it or going to events. Meanwhile giving out large sums of money to everyone, is only giving hope to people who will not emerge. 
, 
 has been the case for a large number of visual 
 that lived only thanks to projects issued by city councils, 
  nearly no one was interested in their work. 
, there are other sectors, in which every penny is important, that could benefit more from public funds. 
 could be the case with social security, where there is a desperate need for 
 that really helps to improve some people's life. Considering all these issues, 
 funding for 
 should be at least limited.
In conclusion, I think that it is important to 
 , but that 
  should be limited. As stated above, there are too many 
 who cannot sustain themselves with their productions and they should  simply have to find another path in life because giving money to them is only a burden. 
, government-funded events can be an occasion for someone to gain recognition, so 
 type of 
 should not be cancelled. For these reasons, the 
 should be in form of giving spaces where performers can promote themselves, and not direct financing.