Investing lots of money on arts and artist has become a trend. In certain demographics, they believe this is a waste of money, others, however, argue that money should be spent on the development of arts and support to artist should be given. This essay will discuss why money should be spent on artist but why it is more important to invest more in other areas, such as science and health.
People are divided on the issue of government's funding to artists. Some people opine that the state is providing remarkable support to the arts related community, however, others belive that the taxpayers money should be diverted to other important aspects such as education and employment. In my opinion, governments should focus on providing eductaion and jobs to more people.
In the salad days of the millennium, society is polarised into two groups almost equally. Regarding the notion that, whether the government should support the artist with a plethora of incentives or spend money on other sectors such as environment, water etc. However, different people have distinct mindset. I do not agree with both the views. In my opinion, the authorities should support the inventor as well as other matters. The following paragraph would shed light on both approaches before making a final note.
Although many artists are well supported by the authorities, some people believe that it is the profligacy of public funds, and it will become necessary to use the taxpayers' money more frugally. This essay opines that many artists couldn’t continue to work without
It is argued by some individuals that states should provide a huge financial aid to the artists. However, others do not agree and believe that helping artists is a wasteful step and this money can be utilized in other prospects. This essay will discuss both the notions followed by an opinion.
Governments of many states are supporting artists financially, but some individuals consider that it is wrong and there are many other areas to invest money in more productive way. This essay agrees with the second opinion because the art cannot improve people’s life better in material way.
Certainly, art is a way through which a person expresses his or her feelings. While some people view that government should provide a huge number of supports to these, known as artists, some people argue that it is a waste of time. Both the reasons for it might be valid but I strongly believe that adequate support must must be given to the ceators of art.
According to the recent studies, most of the population are turning towards a secured job which will help them to stay protected in their life which on the other hand decreasing the intrest towards many other professions like painting, handicrafts and many more. The steps taken by the government to help them to stand in the society by providing financial aid is now being a bit controversial because "money spent for their development can be utilised for some other activities" is some people opinion. This essay will put forth the positives and negatives of supporting the artists and using this money for some different purposes.
Artists are very important in the society. They not only play crucial role in arts, but also development of the entertainment. They can act like mirrors of the cultures, they can showcase culture to world in a beautiful way. Some governments spend a lots of money on artists to support them. Some people argue it is a waste of money and that could have been spent better elsewhere. They don't support artists. I strongly oppose their argument.
Many artists are well supported by their governments, but some feel that this is a misuse of taxpayers’ money. Although many artists couldn’t continue to work without this support, I feel that public healthcare is in more urgent need of the money.
Art tells about the heritage and culture of the country. Moreover, governments are providing financial aid to encourage artists. On the other hand, a fair amount of people considers the amount of money spend by governments to support art can be used in developing the nation. Before, drafting my final conclusion on this topic, I will discuss the both sides of the topic.
Few people argue that the government should spending on various welfare activities like the development of education, technology, and employment instead of spending on artists while few people argue that, art is an important part of society and plays a key role in everyone's life, and the government should encourage the artists responsible for such arts. In my opinion, it is not necessary for the government to invest in artists when communities are suffering from a lack of several other basic facilities.
Art plays paramount role in our society. but many people believe that investing wealth on creatives by Government is not good because, there are numerous factors such as health care, education and many more, where fund should be invested. This essay will argue why ministry should raise hands for the help of artists plus why should spend on other sectors.
Goverments Give lots of support to artists has become an integral part of the rising debate of the present world, While proponents of arguments are in favour, However the opponents arguments are completly againts the relevance of the artists help. In my opinion artist promotion by Goverments has more positive impact than negative in the globe.