In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believes the money should be spent on improving exisitng public transport. Discuss both views and give your own pinion.
Nowadays, people residing in different nations hold contrasting views about the spending of funds in the transport sector. Some believe that it is essential to invest in new railway projects,
however
, others opine that it is paramount to enhance already established public transit. This
essay will talk about both these views and find out which is the suitable procedure to adopt.
To begin
with, considering the congestion in the cities these days, the development of new railway lines between urban centres is the dire need of the hour. Since the urban sprawl is on a spectacular rise, it would turn out to be a productive outcome if governments spend money on novel projects relating to railways. This
initiative will prove beneficial for people living in urban centres because they will be able to reach their desired destinations in time. For instance
, they will not get
late for their offices and workplaces. Verb problem
be
Moreover
, the building of this
means of transportation will have a profound effect on overcrowding cities, thus
reducing bottlenecks. Therefore
, spending on railway lines will result in convenience for the general populace.
Having said that, the capital being spent on already established infrastructure relating to public transit will have some productive consequences. When a government takes an
initiative regarding the development of new means of travelling, it requires a lot of manpower and investments. Correct article usage
the
Nevertheless
, at the same time, it can utilise those workers and money to ameliorate the constituted public transit. For example
, they can invest in transforming established public transport into a high-capacity transportation system. That would surely cope with the burgeoning population in the cities. Hence
, investments in the existing transportation system will not prove futile.
In a nutshell, even though there are benefits of streamlining trains in an urban centre which is now crowded to a great extent, I inferred that it requires a great deal of capital, manpower, skilled personnel and heavy machinery. So, it would be more auspicious if a government plans to restrengthen the public transport which is already in use. After a thorough analysis of this
subject, it is predicted that governments will prefer to invest more money in the already-established rail infrastructure.Submitted by kamran_lashari81 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Ensure that the essay addresses all parts of the question and fully develops both opinions. Provide specific examples to support each view.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are clear. However, work on organizing the body paragraphs to improve coherence and cohesion.
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!