Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

It is stated that affluent countries should provide impoverished states with supplies when natural disasters occur.

This

essay agrees with

this

statement because

this

kind of aid is a moral obligation and it reduces the spread of diseases. Provision of humanitarian relief to poor states during natural disasters is the right thing to do in terms of

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

human being. Humans have a conscience that prompts us to come to the aid of those who are suffering.

As a result

, nations that have means to address the unfortunate situations caused by nature in poorer states consider the provisions of

assistance

as appropriate.

For instance

, in 2009, developed countries provided enormous

assistance

to enable people to tackle problems caused by the earthquake in Azerbaijan, which demolished a vast majority of residential areas.

Furthermore

,

such

assistance

prevents the transmission of infections. After a major natural catastrophe

such

as a tsunami or flood, poor people lose their necessities like houses, water supply, food, and health care. If these kinds of basic needs are not available, diseases quickly develop, and spread. Take the UNICEF report,

for instance

, which demonstrated a sharp decline in the rate of

diarrhea

Change the spelling

diarrhoea

show examples

caused by flooding in Nigeria

due to

aid from the UK and the US. In conclusion, there is a belief that rich countries should provide poor nations with

assistance

during natural catastrophes. I agree with

this

statement since it is correct moral

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

and obligation in terms of humankind and an adequate method to control the spread of infectious diseases.