death penality is best way to control and reduce the crime rate to what extent do you agree ?

In

this

modern law era, some people argue that the death

punishment

is the greatest way to handle and reduce the number of criminal activities.

However

, others argue that it is contrary to the principle of human

rights

. I totally agree with the second opinion because there is no guarantee that the rate of

criminals

will decrease if the penalty is applied and other reasons will explain more in

this

essay.

Firstly

, I think that taking someone's life is not the job of the government.

Moreover

, if the reason to apply the

punishment

is to control and reduce the crime rates. Government, as the policy maker has to rethink before enforcing the law by providing other data that prove that the rates of people who commit crimes will decrease.

Instead

of killing

criminals

, the government should try to find another type of penalty.

For instance

,

criminals

should be imprisoned on isolated islands or areas where they cannot interact with the social community.

Secondly

, killing others is actually contrary to the agreements of human

rights

. In

this

case, some human

rights

activists will complain about that regulations because they believe that the death penalty cannot reduce the number of

criminals

.

Furthermore

, if we use the perspective of religion, we cannot find that there is no one religion that agrees that death

punishment

is legal. In conclusion, In my point of view, I strongly believe that

this

kind of

punishment

is not appropriate to apply because it will deprive someone's human

rights

and

also

it will get more protests from most activists that put more attention on the law.