"Prevention is better thon cure", Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree.

Because of their complication, some diseases need to be researched and studied,

thus

, many people think that it would be too expensive to cure them and prevention of them seems like the most optimal decision with which I would strongly disagree. Finding a cure for a disease is surely a costly process, but it is feasible. In the case of funding to prevent disease humanity can face some difficulties,

such

as failure in implementing the project. A major project that aims to prevent a particular disease may turn out to be alleged and a significant amount of money would be wasted.

For example

, in 2007, the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) looked to revolutionize the way technology is used in the health sector, through the introduction of electronic health records and digital scanning. But it failed because of contractual changes, including changing specifications, and the estimated cost of the abandoned project is around to be £11.4 billion mark.

Furthermore

, if even prevention of diseases would be implemented it would abolish the country’s economy, the reason

that

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

is that many employees working in the field of medicine can lose their jobs. To exemplify, the surgeon who removes cancer in the organism can lose his job to which he dedicated a major part of his life.

As a result

, there will be many unemployed individuals, and society will downgrade in terms of occupation. Taking everything into consideration, I would state that I do not agree that funding preventive measures

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

better than cure. Because

this

approach has a lot of risks and drawbacks.