Some people say that Government should break down all the historic building and replace them with modern buildings. Do you agree or disagree.

Historical places and

buildings

are the

country

's heritage and no one can deny that they role an important part in every

country

's history. Some people believe that government need to change these

buildings

to more developed and modern ones. In my point of view, I disagree with that opinion and the reason for

that is

because we need these facilities to know about the past life of our

country

. The purpose of

this

essay is to discuss why I am inclined to the importance of historical

buildings

and we have to keep them.

To begin

,with the effects that old places have towards the citizens of the

country

.

For example

, if a

country

had a war years ago

then

people wouldn't know about the tragedy that happened before without seeing the real place.

Furthermore

, replacing them can result in losing the identity of the

country

.

On the other hand

, it can be argued that it may impact the touristy of the

country

as many tourists are travelling to see the historical industry to know more about the culture of

this

country

. A good example of

this

is provided by some countries

such

as Rome where it has the Pisa tower that every tourist would like to visit.It is equally important to recognise that one of the key reasons why the government shouldn't replace old

buildings

is

the

Change the word

their

show examples

appearance of them they have a really unique shape and design. In the conclusion,

to sum up

Add a comma

,

show examples

everything that has been stated I would like to reiterate my opinion that historical

buildings

are part of the heritage and

that is

everybody's responsibility to protect them at any cost.