some think increasing business and culural contact between nations is positive. Others think it leads to the dissappearance of national identity. Discuss both Views and state your own opinion.

In recent times, partnerships and alignments between countries had become even more essential

due to

global demand.

Although

some believe that

such

coordination and contacts are prone to rupture the identity of the country, others argue that why

such

mutual tie-ups are beneficial in the longer run. In

this

essay, I would like to discuss both views but substantiate my support for the latter. On one hand, most countries have their unique selling point, which is important for undergoing trade and employment, that can be widely impacted

due to

partnerships.

This

is because their methods, practices, traditions and skills might be vulnerable to being disclosed among others.

Furthermore

, each country has its own history and political view, that helped propel its economy, and can get influenced or exploited by other nations with contrasting views, when there is a surge in cultural contact between them.

On the other hand

, it is important to consider that the modern world's rapid growth is built upon the rise in coordination between different countries.

This

is

due to

the fact that trade proved to have played a major influence towards the current growth and development. To illustrate

this

, the silk trade between Great Britain and China around 300 years back, gave rise to several industries and occupations.

In contrast

, if the Chinese would have refrained to share a skill that was touted to be their identity, there wouldn't have been a major growth that ultimately benefitted both. Having looked at both sides,

although

it is important that a government keeps its culture and business intact to preserve its identity, the advantages of having a rise in collaboration among other nations will be more beneficial eventually, as stated in the examples above.