Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Those in

favor

Change the spelling

favour

show examples

of state control over research argue governments are not motivated to generate revenue.

Companies

are inherently concerned with amassing capital and maximizing returns for shareholders and equity partners. An illustrative example of the threat here would be the opioid crisis currently ravaging the United States. Purdue, a privately-owned pharmaceutical manufacturer, produced a pill

with

Change preposition

without

show examples

knowledge of its extremely addictive properties and intentionally misled the public. The results have been millions of deaths and rising addiction rates to opioids

such

as heroin.

In contrast

, the government is able to prioritize public health since they do not have to earn a profit.

However

, the example above is an extreme exception as most

companies

are motivated to innovate and contribute to the public good.

The examples

Correct article usage

Examples

show examples

of

this

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

abound though they are less likely to receive excessive media attention.

Such

breakthroughs include medicines

such

as the vaccine for Covid-19 developed by Pfizer and the technologies that

companies

such

as Apple, Google, and Samsung have pioneered in recent decades. These private

companies

are able to hire and pay the best employees and are often led by visionary leaders who are driven to excel and overcome competition from other firms. The corporate environment creates the catalyst for scientists and researchers to develop transformative devices and make discoveries that benefit the general citizenry. In conclusion,

although

companies

are likely to pursue profits at all costs, they are

also

more motivated to innovate. The role of government is

therefore

to contain the worst excesses of the corporate world.