Making smoking illegal is the best way to protect people from the harmful effects of tobacco. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Some people argue that the best way to protect them from the harmful effects of tobacco is by making smoking illegal. In my point of view, it will attract a wave of protest from
smokers
because they argue that smoking is not the main problem that causes diseases in the human body. Some
smokers
will protest when a smoking activity becomes illegal. In
this
case, it happens because society in
this
present day becomes more addicted and thinks they are not getting any diseases by smoking and are not harmful to others. Not only from
smokers
, but protests may
also
come from cigarette companies because it will give a more negative impact on the economy field.
For example
, by making smoking an illegal activity, it will close manufacturing, increase unemployment, and indirectly can reduce the income of a country provided by cigarette manufacturers. As we know that country
such
as Indonesia has more income from that business and if the law is implemented it can make the Indonesian economy collapse. If the government want to reduce the negative effects, it is better that the authority increase the tax on a cigarette. by implementing
this
law, only a particular population will buy that product and
then
slowly change their way of life because they will think twice if they want to be active
smokers
. In
this
case, it will reduce access for youngsters to become active
smokers
because most of them do not have jobs and enough money.
For instance
, Singapura is one of some countries that success to reduce the number of
smokers
by adding more taxes on tobacco-based products.
As a result
, many Singaporean are healthier and live longer than people who live in other countries that have unstrict rules about smoking. In conclusion, Making smoking illegal is not the only way that the government have to do because it will affect other fields
such
as the economy. If the aim is to reduce the risk given by smoking, the government should try to reduce the number of smoking by increasing the tax on that product.
Submitted by rahmad.iriyandi on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: