Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open, and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media Do you agree with this view, or do you think that in some circumstances government should limit the freedom of the media.

Nowadays, most

people

believe that it is necessary to see

media

sources

or news.

While

others believe that the government should limit

such

news. In

this

essay, I will look at both sides of the argument and explain why I strongly agree with the

letter

Change noun form

letter's

show examples

opinion. First of all, as we live in modern life,

although

mass

media

play a vital role in human life, we are all aware that today various unreliable

sources

are spread.

In other words

, the increase in the number of unreliable messages on the Internet, especially on websites, can have negative consequences.

As a result

, the government can eliminate

such

false information without difficulty and it is more beneficial for humans to do so.

That is

to say, some

people

's daily plans can be changed by false accounts.

For example

, the inhabitants of Chile, located on the coast of the sea, even fled to neighbouring countries in order to avoid the flood, believing various rumours that there will be a big flood in Chile

last

year.

On the other hand

, as mentioned above, there is

also

an argument that restricting the viewing of materials in the

media

causes inconvenience to

people

.

People

with

such

an opinion believe that the government has the right to limit the news, which means that

people

cannot find the necessary

sources

for themselves

due to

the fact that many messages are limited through many false

sources

. In conclusion, in my opinion, no matter what happens, the limitation of

media

messages is still effective for the population of the world.