Some people belive that the death penalty should be abolishe. Other believe that it is necessary for certain crimes. Discuss both sides and gives your opinio.

Some

people

argue that the death

penalty

should never be

while

others believe that it is necessary for heinous crimes.

This

essay will discuss both points of view.

To begin

with,a Criminal, who has been involved in major offences

such

as kidnapping and murder should be dealt with very seriously.The

penalty

for

such

acts of violence should be swift.

This

will send a strong message to the public of a country. It will remind the consequences are very harsh and

this

message will help to reduce capital crimes.

For example

,in Saudi Arabia, who are the made-up punishment for murder is immediate death.

On the other hand

,some disagree and feel that the death

penalty

should not be practised. Because human life is precious and considered to be a gift of Allah.Some

people

feel that taking someone's life is a barbaric act,no matter what the reason is.

Additionally

, in the case of major felonies , few argue that convicted persons should be given another chance to change themselves .

For example

, James Arthur is currently 32

years

old. When he was 8

years

old, he murdered innocent women without realizing it.

Then

a few

years

back the court announced that he was to reduce her sentence to 5

years

.Now he is working and he has proven himself to be a good citizen. In Conclusion, many

people

support the capital

penalty

for serious crimes

whereas

some

people

disagree with it. In my opinion,

although

both arguments are right, I believe that the capital

penalty

must be used to ensure the safety of the country.