Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extant do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It has long been argued that funding wild

animals

Use synonyms

such

Linking Words

as the tiger or the blue whale is just a waste of money since they have nothing valuable for the government or the community. I totally disagree with

this

Linking Words

thought and firmly believe that there are several solutions to

this

Linking Words

dilemma. The following paragraphs will analyze

this

Linking Words

phenomenon

while

Linking Words

contributing my opinion. Even though it can not be denied that governments have more serious concerns related to their citizens, they should

also

Linking Words

take care of wildlife. Unfortunately, the red list of

animals

Use synonyms

is growing dramatically nowadays;

for example

Linking Words

, some types of tigers or elephants face massive extinction.

Hence

Linking Words

we should continue to protect them no matter what it takes

due to

Linking Words

the need for their alikeness because they will be needed for the new generation to have imaginations what these kinds of

animals

Use synonyms

in the world.

In other words

Linking Words

, it can be cruel for threatened animal species to let them die out because every creature has its own crucial rule in life and has particular tasks.

For instance

Linking Words

, these creatures can help the environment where they live in marine or forests.

Hence

Linking Words

, it is important for everyone to take

animals

Use synonyms

' lives seriously and help them live

further

Linking Words

. In conclusion, I pen down saying that authorities have to provide endangered wild

animals

Use synonyms

with safety, even though they are

also

Linking Words

responsible for residents. I think there are several solutions and ways to hold responsibility and devote money to both

animals

Use synonyms

and humans.