Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extant do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It has long been argued that funding wild

animals

such

as the tiger or the blue whale is just a waste of money since they have nothing valuable for the government or the community. I totally disagree with

this

thought and firmly believe that there are several solutions to

this

dilemma. The following paragraphs will analyze

this

phenomenon

while

contributing my opinion. Even though it can not be denied that governments have more serious concerns related to their citizens, they should

also

take care of wildlife. Unfortunately, the red list of

animals

is growing dramatically nowadays;

for example

, some types of tigers or elephants face massive extinction.

Hence

we should continue to protect them no matter what it takes

due to

the need for their alikeness because they will be needed for the new generation to have imaginations what these kinds of

animals

in the world.

In other words

, it can be cruel for threatened animal species to let them die out because every creature has its own crucial rule in life and has particular tasks.

For instance

, these creatures can help the environment where they live in marine or forests.

Hence

, it is important for everyone to take

animals

' lives seriously and help them live

further

. In conclusion, I pen down saying that authorities have to provide endangered wild

animals

with safety, even though they are

also

responsible for residents. I think there are several solutions and ways to hold responsibility and devote money to both

animals

and humans.