Some people believe that the arts should receive subsidies or sponsorship from government and big companies. Others feel such spending is a luxury and that it would be better if it were invested in scientific projects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, governments have to decide for which
projects
they would designate the budget of the country. While
many people
believe that subsidies and sponsorship from governments should be invested in scientific projects
rather than arts
, I support the opposite idea because the relevance of arts
is crucial for everyday people
’s daily lives, for understanding and controlling their emotions.
Many people
believe that sciences deserve a larger sum of money than arts
. Proponents of this
view may suggest that spending on the arts
is unnecessary because this
field is irrelevant to the population, contrasting with other fields such
as science, transport, or engineering. For example
, when the COVID pandemic occurred, the medical solution was in scientists’ hands, while
at the same ,time the availability of products in markets was carried out by transporters. Moreover
, in emergency situations arts
may not be useful to directly solve the problem, whereas
good quality equipment that scientists could have will be. If states increase their sponsorship of scientific projects
, the world will experience a growth in knowledge and could be able to treat many diseases that are now impossible.
However
, arts
are as important as other fields of work because people
consume them throughout their entire life. Everyone spends much of their time watching videos, and films, listening to music or doing other art-related activities. Furthermore
, many people
’s hobbies are sometimes related to arts
, which are used to understand concepts such
as life, death, happiness or sadness. For instance
, when people
feel different emotions, they usually connect with some art in order to feel understood. For these reasons, arts
need private economic funding and sponsorship from states to provide low-cost access to high-quality arts
, accessible to everyone who wants to enjoy them.
To conclude
, there is a debate about whether the arts
should be funded or sponsored rather than designate money on scientific projects
. Although
I understand the relevance of having good resources in science, I support that arts
are as important as other fields of work because they take part in everyday people
’s lives and should be granted to anyone who wants to consume them.Submitted by carlos.terapiaocupacional on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.