As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is certainly true that over the
last
decade, the number of automobiles has increased, as a result
, the discussion about road services has arisen, some suggest that drivers
should pay for it, while
others think that governments should do it. In this
essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument in detail, and provide options as to why the second opinion is superior.
On one hand, people who take the view that governments should pay for it argue that it's one of their responsibilities towards its citizens, it is well known that road systems are one of the most vital services to the functioning of society, and that's the reason why local councils should spare a part of their budget to this
particular field. Moreover
, individuals already pay a fee before entering highways and it is believed that it is pointed directly to cover the costs of route repairments; therefore
, it is not logical to impose new taxes on drivers
. For example
, in the USA, vehicle operators should pay 20 Dollars for each 150 km. I totally support this
side, in my opinion, it is indeed the responsibility of authorities to take care of route systems.
On the other hand
, supporters of the opposite view claim that only drivers
should carry the burden of extra costs involved in such
services, they argue that non-drivers
should not pay an amount of their income in order to participate in something that they don't usually use. Furthermore
, Individuals who use cars are responsible for the damage that occurs, thus
, they are the only ones who have to get involved in the repairments, whether by paying extra taxes or other ways, for instance
, in some Asian countries, governments have introduced new laws to force local drivers
to pay extra cash once in 2 years to fix their routes.
To conclude
, there are convincing arguments both for and against the costs of the management of road systems; however
, I believe that it is the liability of authorities.Submitted by saberyouc on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that the introduction includes a clear thesis statement and the conclusion summarizes the main points.
task response
Ensure that you fully address both views and provide a clear opinion. Use specific examples to support your points.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!