The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In
this
day and age, means of transport namely cars or motorbikes are one of the factors causing environmental issues. It is believed that the legal bodies should elevate the taxes on the price of petrol and gas used as material for a significant number of vehicles. From my perspective,
this
opinion is valid to a certain extent, but I still it is quite reasonable. The following paragraphs would shed light on my viewpoint. Admittedly, the protesters of
this
standpoint have their rational ground.
First,
private transportations
such
as scooters and cars endow the convenience of moving. In fact, the traffic in Vietnam is quite chaotic, especially in metropolises like Ha Noi or Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnamese civilians prefer private vehicles
instead
of taking buses because the aforementioned transportations allow them to squeeze in the gaps of the road,
while
buses move at snails’ pace.
Second,
the cost of electricity increases which impacts tremendously on the economy. In reality, gasoline pricing is one of the most crucial elements for the national economy.
For instance
, when rising in gas prices, a legion of enterprises have to pay more fees for delivery, which leads to an increase in the price of products and services,
as well as
causes inflation.
However
, the above arguments are insufficient to overshadow the merits of the topic in question. The most pertinent point is that the decrease in demand for clients using ammunition has a conducive influence on the habitat of citizens and animals. In the past, when means of transport which use fuel does not have yet become ubiquitous, the average life expectancy of Vietnamese are quite high. In
this
day and age,
this
number drops because individuals are able to suffer from cardiovascular problems and respiratory. Another justification is that the officials would receive the amount of budget to invest in building facilities. In fact, the government can utilize
this
money for rebuilding roads and bridges in urban areas.
This
action would enhance the quality of life of inhabitants. In conclusion, it is disputable that the government should not increase the price of fuel because of its convenience and detrimental effect on the economy. But I still believe that the authorities are able to enact the law of cost in manufacturing petroline as
this
action has a negative influence on the surroundings and gets money for investing in infrastructures.
Submitted by nttung.182 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • excessive use
  • encouraging public transportation
  • sustainable energy sources
  • hydrogen-powered vehicles
  • generate additional revenue
  • environmentally friendly projects
  • disproportionately affects
  • lower-income individuals
  • accessible public transportation options
  • sudden hikes
  • inflation
  • social inequality
  • renewable energy
  • promoting carpooling
  • equitable
  • addressing environmental issues
  • punitive measures
  • sustainable lifestyle
What to do next:
Look at other essays: