Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the present world, governments bear noteworthy expenditures for saving endangered animal

species

. Even the tiger and the blue whale are among the many

species

in which governments invest a lot of money.

Nonetheless

, I strongly disagree that

this

represents a waste of money. Analysing the essential importance each life form has on the ecosystem of our planet,

as well as

how much their disappearance is our own fault will prove

this

.

Firstly

, every single specie has a considerable impact on the ecosystem of our world.

For instance

, if blue whales faded away

this

would lead to an imbalance within the marine environment, as the number of plankton and other kinds of fish would rise out of control.

This

fact would eventually lead to the loss of other animal

species

.

Thus

,

this

makes it clear that spending on their saving is not a waste of money.

Secondly

, the vanishing of many

species

is

due to

our bad and careless behaviours; the carelessness of today's human beings towards every aspect of nature is the main cause of

this

phenomenon.

For example

, the global warming we are experiencing in the

last

decade is fatal for many animals. It is our responsibility to take care of our own mistakes,

instead

of ignoring them.

Therefore

, it becomes apparent that it is our duty to save animal

species

at risk. To summarize, the outlay by the governments on the preservation of endangered animal

species

is essential.

Consequently

,

it is clear that

the idea of stopping from bearing expenses for saving

species

at risk cannot be supported. After a thorough analysis and discussion of

this

subject, it is recommended people will face their own responsibilities in

this

matter.