A significant number of researchers negate the reciprocal relationship between the affluence of a nation and the satisfaction of citizens in that country.
,
topic has become a controversial issue, and I think that
opinion is completely unreasonable. I will explain my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
On the first hand, supporters of
opinion have their rational grounds.
, a state is increasingly prosperous, resulting in the cost which its civilians have to pay for living. In fact, the government of Korea, which has the leading economic development rate in the world, is extremely concerned about the surge of slums in the
centerChange the spelling
show examples
of Seoul. The residents of
low-income neighbourhood said that they are unable to afford the consistent growth of the expenditure for basic needs, namely food and shelter.
, they must opt for a shabby home in order to save money.
, the thriving of a nation is not the only measure of one’s satisfaction. To be specific, there are countless factors to take into account
as well-being, and the care of surrounding people, and each individual has diverse measurements of his happiness.
, many children of wealthy families committed suicide
the lack of freedom and the care of their parents.
, the above arguments are insufficient to overshadow the pitfalls of
issue. First and foremost,
the affluent of a nation is not the only element that leads to satisfaction, it still plays an important role in it. In rich countries, economic growth can improve the quality of life through better public services or social welfare.
why developed countries, including America and England, are always the dream living locations of most individuals around the world.
, despite the increased cost of living, residents in thriving nations fully enjoy modern public resources
as schools.
, their offspring will have access to advanced educational programs, which are better than most other nations.
In conclusion,
opinion of some experts is plausible because of the inaccurate measurement method and negative consequences of economic development
as the elevation of the cost of living.
, the indisputable benefits of prosperous nations offset the stated arguments.