Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is reasonable for cultural and historical

destinations

to charge

foreigners

higher costs than local citizens. From my perspective, I totally agree with

this

notion of the opportunity cost of

foreigners

and the chance for the locals to take advantage of wonderful landscapes in their own country. The expenditure of overseas people in some cultural areas should be higher than the local. It is

such

a trade-off for

foreigners

to travel and have an insight into the unique landscapes and wonderful architecture in another country. They can experience conventional

destinations

in reality

instead

of watching those eye-catching images in real programs on television. By travelling directly,

foreigners

have more opportunities to approach many interesting things in the country they visit. In real journeys, foreign travellers are more likely to know and comprehend the natural beauty of the cultural and historical

destinations

through the informative conveying of dedicated tour guides.

On the other hand

, citizens should be supported to travel to domestic areas. Thanks to the discounts for the inhabitants in picturesque landscapes, they could increase the likelihood of widening their horizons about the wonderfully cultural

destinations

existing where they were born.

In particular

, some schools recently have organized short trips to historical museums or wonderful places for students to explore the convention of these places and

also

to expose themselves to practical knowledge . Thanks to these journeys, young generations can raise their awareness about historical attractions and

also

make them more excited to study History. In conclusion, I agree that

foreigners

should spend much more money on visiting cultural and historical

destinations

.